<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Assuming compilers are clever enough (part 1)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shape-of-code.coding-guidelines.com/2009/05/12/assuming-compilers-are-clever-enough-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shape-of-code.coding-guidelines.com/2009/05/12/assuming-compilers-are-clever-enough-part-1/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 22:01:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TemporalBeing</title>
		<link>http://shape-of-code.coding-guidelines.com/2009/05/12/assuming-compilers-are-clever-enough-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-589</link>
		<dc:creator>TemporalBeing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 17:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shape-of-code.coding-guidelines.com/?p=97#comment-589</guid>
		<description>Perhaps is has more to do with code-portability...

For example, programmers that go between C and C++ a lot probably use more #define&#039;s than &#039;const&#039; for constants simple for portability between the two (and not having to remember which language you&#039;re in the middle of)...

Just a thought...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps is has more to do with code-portability&#8230;</p>
<p>For example, programmers that go between C and C++ a lot probably use more #define&#8217;s than &#8216;const&#8217; for constants simple for portability between the two (and not having to remember which language you&#8217;re in the middle of)&#8230;</p>
<p>Just a thought&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

