<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Predictions for 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shape-of-code.coding-guidelines.com/2008/12/31/predictions-for-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shape-of-code.coding-guidelines.com/2008/12/31/predictions-for-2009/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 22:01:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Shape of Code &#187; Assessing my predictions for 2009</title>
		<link>http://shape-of-code.coding-guidelines.com/2008/12/31/predictions-for-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-1044</link>
		<dc:creator>The Shape of Code &#187; Assessing my predictions for 2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 02:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shape-of-code.coding-guidelines.com/?p=46#comment-1044</guid>
		<description>[...] have been rather remiss in revisiting the predictions I made for 2009 to see how they fared. Only two out of the six predictions were sufficiently precise to enable an [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have been rather remiss in revisiting the predictions I made for 2009 to see how they fared. Only two out of the six predictions were sufficiently precise to enable an [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

